<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Skrift</title>
	<atom:link href="http://web.skrift.co.uk/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://web.skrift.co.uk</link>
	<description>David Lloyd</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 25 Apr 2010 19:13:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Momentary Lapse of Reason by Stephanie</title>
		<link>http://web.skrift.co.uk/2010/03/23/a-momentary-lapse-of-reason/#comment-280</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stephanie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 11:29:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://web.skrift.co.uk/?p=1033#comment-280</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I can&#039;t be bothered to read all that, can you summarise it in 140 characters or less please?

(not really, I enjoyed it - bit jealous of your mum and her Sky + box though, I want one.)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t be bothered to read all that, can you summarise it in 140 characters or less please?</p>
<p>(not really, I enjoyed it &#8211; bit jealous of your mum and her Sky + box though, I want one.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Momentary Lapse of Reason by Bryn Gerard</title>
		<link>http://web.skrift.co.uk/2010/03/23/a-momentary-lapse-of-reason/#comment-279</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bryn Gerard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 10:26:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://web.skrift.co.uk/?p=1033#comment-279</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What an interesting article! 

I have noticed that peopleseem to have a limited attention span and the ability to concentrate is being diminished by the drive to be &quot;entertained&quot;.  

Effort seems like a dirty word and although man often looks for the &quot;easy way&quot; he tends to realize that hard work is the only thing that produces anything in the end and that things built slowly endure.

Bryn]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What an interesting article! </p>
<p>I have noticed that peopleseem to have a limited attention span and the ability to concentrate is being diminished by the drive to be &#8220;entertained&#8221;.  </p>
<p>Effort seems like a dirty word and although man often looks for the &#8220;easy way&#8221; he tends to realize that hard work is the only thing that produces anything in the end and that things built slowly endure.</p>
<p>Bryn</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The C Word by Bryn Gerard</title>
		<link>http://web.skrift.co.uk/2010/03/07/the-c-word/#comment-275</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bryn Gerard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 13:25:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://web.skrift.co.uk/?p=1006#comment-275</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The worst part of twitter is the automated response of many.  I glaze over when 5, 6, 10 Tweets come from the same group/person who has clearly automated their web site to pump Tweets of every change to the uninterested world.  On Twitter, the less you tweet the more potent your communication, or so it seems.  Twitter has two communication modes, your followers with whom you are more intimate with and then there the Twitterverse communicated to through #tags and reTweets. There is a subtle difference that I can&#039;t quite  put my finger on at the moment.

Many tweets are laden with #tags that have a function but when they equal more than the tweet content it makes you wonder and it makes the tweet almost unreadable.

I believe the days of megaphone communication are close to an end.  I think most people are immediately sceptical of advertising because they are sick of being conned. 

Personal recommendation has always been the most powerful form of advertising.  You can&#039;t buy it, your product or service must be quality to evoke it.

People need to know it exists in the first place to recommend it and so a happy balance is needed to be a successful advertiser.

By and large the majority of people are unaffected by what is in the media.  There might be an event like 9/11 or the &quot;Credit Crunch&quot; that has an impact in their lives but mostly the media contains things that are happening to other people.  The world, is something out there, not part of what they are up to and therefore largely irrelevant.


Bryn]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The worst part of twitter is the automated response of many.  I glaze over when 5, 6, 10 Tweets come from the same group/person who has clearly automated their web site to pump Tweets of every change to the uninterested world.  On Twitter, the less you tweet the more potent your communication, or so it seems.  Twitter has two communication modes, your followers with whom you are more intimate with and then there the Twitterverse communicated to through #tags and reTweets. There is a subtle difference that I can&#8217;t quite  put my finger on at the moment.</p>
<p>Many tweets are laden with #tags that have a function but when they equal more than the tweet content it makes you wonder and it makes the tweet almost unreadable.</p>
<p>I believe the days of megaphone communication are close to an end.  I think most people are immediately sceptical of advertising because they are sick of being conned. </p>
<p>Personal recommendation has always been the most powerful form of advertising.  You can&#8217;t buy it, your product or service must be quality to evoke it.</p>
<p>People need to know it exists in the first place to recommend it and so a happy balance is needed to be a successful advertiser.</p>
<p>By and large the majority of people are unaffected by what is in the media.  There might be an event like 9/11 or the &#8220;Credit Crunch&#8221; that has an impact in their lives but mostly the media contains things that are happening to other people.  The world, is something out there, not part of what they are up to and therefore largely irrelevant.</p>
<p>Bryn</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The C Word by David Lloyd</title>
		<link>http://web.skrift.co.uk/2010/03/07/the-c-word/#comment-274</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Lloyd]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 10:16:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://web.skrift.co.uk/?p=1006#comment-274</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nicely put. It&#039;s funny, isn&#039;t it, how even stuff like Twitter (the ultimate way for people to express themselves) is fast becoming an exercise in &#039;trending topics&#039; - we seem less able, or willing, to make our own choices. And once we let go of them, it&#039;s very difficult to claw them back.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nicely put. It&#8217;s funny, isn&#8217;t it, how even stuff like Twitter (the ultimate way for people to express themselves) is fast becoming an exercise in &#8216;trending topics&#8217; &#8211; we seem less able, or willing, to make our own choices. And once we let go of them, it&#8217;s very difficult to claw them back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The C Word by Bryn Gerard</title>
		<link>http://web.skrift.co.uk/2010/03/07/the-c-word/#comment-273</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bryn Gerard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 10:12:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://web.skrift.co.uk/?p=1006#comment-273</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well I have to wonder, we live in the Information age.  The ability to communicate new ideas etc.  is like never before.  Why do we need the BBC or local newspaper groups to give us choice? 

Is it because people still need someone in authority to tell them what is important?

Clearly, to run a credible media orgnisation requires considerable resources and yet it is clear that most of the printed media have few staff writers nowadays.  They rely on screwing freelancers and lifting material from anywhere they see fit.  Often the editor will publish stories that bear little resemblance to what the author had intended. (I speak from exprience :-() and what ends up on the page is pure fabrication.

I have a friend who worked as a photographer for AP,  he covered the Balkans war and then was given the Champions League as an assignment to help him recover.  He photographs fish off the coast of Portugal now because he is sick and tired of his work being misrepresented.

Wharhol claimed that we would all be famous for 5 mins, yet we can all be famous for as long as we can get someone to pay attention to us. It is surely matter of magnetic potency.  If what you produce has value, more people are attracted to it.

Most choice equals conflict.  How many kinds of toothpast do we need?  This *choice* is what is killing the planet,  it produces waste on scale that has never been seen before,  distracting us from the real issues of the day.  

We desperately need a simpler form of living,  that will help us focus on what really needs to be done.  Adequate food, housing healthcare, education and a job should be the goal of mankind, not more brands.

How many people own a video camera that gathers dust in the cupboard and rarely if ever films anything of value?  Yeterday it was the Walkman, now it is the IPod. What a waste of the planets resources!

I am not anti-choice, I am not anti-variety.  It seems that variety has always been wanting.  People are scared of being unique, they want to fit in.  Just look at how young people dress, all wearing the same fashions and if you don&#039;t fit in you will be ridiculed.  Variety is frowned upon. Variety, genuine variety is what makes life interesting if you embrace it.

Bryn]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well I have to wonder, we live in the Information age.  The ability to communicate new ideas etc.  is like never before.  Why do we need the BBC or local newspaper groups to give us choice? </p>
<p>Is it because people still need someone in authority to tell them what is important?</p>
<p>Clearly, to run a credible media orgnisation requires considerable resources and yet it is clear that most of the printed media have few staff writers nowadays.  They rely on screwing freelancers and lifting material from anywhere they see fit.  Often the editor will publish stories that bear little resemblance to what the author had intended. (I speak from exprience <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':-(' class='wp-smiley' /> ) and what ends up on the page is pure fabrication.</p>
<p>I have a friend who worked as a photographer for AP,  he covered the Balkans war and then was given the Champions League as an assignment to help him recover.  He photographs fish off the coast of Portugal now because he is sick and tired of his work being misrepresented.</p>
<p>Wharhol claimed that we would all be famous for 5 mins, yet we can all be famous for as long as we can get someone to pay attention to us. It is surely matter of magnetic potency.  If what you produce has value, more people are attracted to it.</p>
<p>Most choice equals conflict.  How many kinds of toothpast do we need?  This *choice* is what is killing the planet,  it produces waste on scale that has never been seen before,  distracting us from the real issues of the day.  </p>
<p>We desperately need a simpler form of living,  that will help us focus on what really needs to be done.  Adequate food, housing healthcare, education and a job should be the goal of mankind, not more brands.</p>
<p>How many people own a video camera that gathers dust in the cupboard and rarely if ever films anything of value?  Yeterday it was the Walkman, now it is the IPod. What a waste of the planets resources!</p>
<p>I am not anti-choice, I am not anti-variety.  It seems that variety has always been wanting.  People are scared of being unique, they want to fit in.  Just look at how young people dress, all wearing the same fashions and if you don&#8217;t fit in you will be ridiculed.  Variety is frowned upon. Variety, genuine variety is what makes life interesting if you embrace it.</p>
<p>Bryn</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Don&#8217;t Take Away The Music by Sarah Booker</title>
		<link>http://web.skrift.co.uk/2010/02/26/dont-take-away-the-music/#comment-272</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sarah Booker]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 17:08:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://web.skrift.co.uk/?p=999#comment-272</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I used to listen to Xfm until it became too playlisty, but BBC6 Music supplied just what I wanted. Proper music for real folk.

I&#039;ve seen people comment about Spotify, but it doesn&#039;t supply anything other than songs you already know. Last.fm may come close, but it doesn&#039;t have all those sessions.

BBC6 Music is the sort of station John Peel might have been proud of.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I used to listen to Xfm until it became too playlisty, but BBC6 Music supplied just what I wanted. Proper music for real folk.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve seen people comment about Spotify, but it doesn&#8217;t supply anything other than songs you already know. Last.fm may come close, but it doesn&#8217;t have all those sessions.</p>
<p>BBC6 Music is the sort of station John Peel might have been proud of.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Don&#8217;t Take Away The Music by Nik Hall</title>
		<link>http://web.skrift.co.uk/2010/02/26/dont-take-away-the-music/#comment-271</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nik Hall]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 15:50:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://web.skrift.co.uk/?p=999#comment-271</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yet another radio station with djs who actually know about, play and love quality music is condemned. Yet the self congratulating, immature, musical morons of Radio 1 get to carry on.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yet another radio station with djs who actually know about, play and love quality music is condemned. Yet the self congratulating, immature, musical morons of Radio 1 get to carry on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Don&#8217;t Take Away The Music by Andrew Burke</title>
		<link>http://web.skrift.co.uk/2010/02/26/dont-take-away-the-music/#comment-270</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew Burke]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 14:06:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://web.skrift.co.uk/?p=999#comment-270</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It feels as though the BBC has just said &quot;Fuck off, we don&#039;t want your type round here&quot;

Where do I tell the BBC to fuck off with their license fee?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It feels as though the BBC has just said &#8220;Fuck off, we don&#8217;t want your type round here&#8221;</p>
<p>Where do I tell the BBC to fuck off with their license fee?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Don&#8217;t Take Away The Music by David Lloyd</title>
		<link>http://web.skrift.co.uk/2010/02/26/dont-take-away-the-music/#comment-269</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Lloyd]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 13:33:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://web.skrift.co.uk/?p=999#comment-269</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[kind of. But I think it&#039;s more a case of anything not mainstream getting ditched completely. 6music is just a manifestation of that mindset, I fear. Two good shows though, you&#039;re right. Let&#039;s hope they continue.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>kind of. But I think it&#8217;s more a case of anything not mainstream getting ditched completely. 6music is just a manifestation of that mindset, I fear. Two good shows though, you&#8217;re right. Let&#8217;s hope they continue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Don&#8217;t Take Away The Music by Tim Burr</title>
		<link>http://web.skrift.co.uk/2010/02/26/dont-take-away-the-music/#comment-268</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim Burr]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 13:25:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://web.skrift.co.uk/?p=999#comment-268</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s hard to be quite so bothered about a single station brand in these days of iPlayer as long as the best programmes survive somewhere. 

I hope Adam and Joe and Guy Garvey can carry on.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s hard to be quite so bothered about a single station brand in these days of iPlayer as long as the best programmes survive somewhere. </p>
<p>I hope Adam and Joe and Guy Garvey can carry on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

